Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:15
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
The comments from Jamie Dimon last week are worth repeating - Forexlive
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Can people who have never met you tell if you are a covert narcissist?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What is your best and worst childhood memory? What was your biggest fear as a child?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Do you know a good lawyer joke?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Troubling Case Links Vaping to Aggressive Lung Cancer - Gizmodo
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
SFPD arresting dozens in 2nd night of mass protests against ICE - Mission Local
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.